Has anyone had a chance to see the new movie yet?
I viewed it this afternoon with friends who are as fond (or more so) of the original text as I am, and that familiarity admittedly colored our reactions. Yet we did find much we liked:
Jim Carrey is quite serious, even understated, compared to some of his early film roles - a good Scrooge.
Lots of familiar names in the supporting cast: people from
The Princess Bride (Cary Elwes, Robin Wright Penn), P&P (Colin Firth),
Castle (Molly Quinn), and
Lost (Fionula Flanagan), not to mention Bob Hoskins (
Hook, etc) as Fezziwig.
Some spectacular visuals:
it opens with an aerial zoom throughout Victorian London, giving snippets of people going about their everyday lives; the time-lapse aging effect on the 'Scrooge and Marley' sign indicating the passing of 7 years, and Marley's ghost.In large part it was faithful to the source material, with a number of quotes being taken right out of the text. Sometimes the accents (intended to give authenticity) made it hard to understand some spoken lines (I found myself thinking that subtitles would be nice

).
On the negative side, there were some "frozen waterfall" moments added to jazz it up:
for example, lots of zooming through the city in addition to the opening sequence, and a plot-stopping scene with the Ghost of Christmas Future - on a horse-driven carriage - chasing an ever-shrinking Scrooge. (These may have been added to make it more spectacular when viewed in 3D). In fact, we agreed that most of the additions related to the Future Ghost's segment, perhaps because it doesn't speak and so the creators needed another way to get its meaning across.It's rated PG in the US, and there definitely are some scenes which may scare some people (I won't detail them here) - but it
is a ghost story, after all.

We found it, all in all, an enjoyable adaptation - especially once we overlooked the 'waterfall' scenes.
