daughter of the King wrote:I've been meaning to post here for weeks but have only just managed to fully collect my thoughts at a time when I could have free reign of the computer without having to watch the clock. Sorry about the delay!
No problem. I only meant to wait a week or so before posting my opinions and it has been *checks calendar* over 6 weeks.
Everyone has had great ideas!

(I’ve only highlighted a few of them below, but that doesn’t mean the others aren’t valid)
Here’s my opinions: I like that the stone table is meant to remind us of the stone tablet God gave to Moses. For me this connection makes the Stone Table and the Deep Magic much more meaningful. I see the Stone Table and the Deep Magic as being like the law in the Old Testament. Under the law we are condemned, but Jesus came and died for us so we would not be condemned. The old covenant related to the law and the ten commandments was replaced by the new covenant. While the Deep Magic has its place and importance, the Deeper Magic (like the new covenant) is more important. The breaking of the Stone Table is a great visual for me of this change from the old covenant to the new covenant. The Stone Table is no longer needed like sacrifices are no longer need for our sins. (I hope this is making sense). I had in mine a great text to support my ideas, but I can’t remember what it was and got tired of trying to find it.
220chrisTian wrote:narnian1 wrote:I guess the first translates to the resurrection itself of Jesus Christ. The deeper magic since beginning of time--from the very beginning God knew what would happen, and even before the earth was created, Jesus was going to die for humanity. This wasn't an idea that came about as time went. God knew all already. He just carried it out in his time.
Excellent!

Jesus Christ, "the Lamb," was "slain from the foundation of the world" [Revelation 13:8]. And Peter tells us He was "foreordained before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you" [1 Peter 1:20]. I think this is the "deeper magic." The White Witch [aka Satan to me] doesn't know this, just like God in Genesis 3:15 has to tell the serpent [aka Satan] that Eve's seed will "bruise [his] head." He wouldn't know otherwise. The devil thinks he's won when Jesus dies on the cross. But this is his defeat and Jesus' [and our] victory.

I agree with this, although I never considered the White Witch as being Satan. The principle is the same though. The devil also would not have knowledge of what God was planning with Jesus.
220chrisTian wrote:What is the significance of the Stone Table being broken in half? This bothered me for a bit. Because Jesus came to fulfill the law, not destroy or break it [Matthew 5:17-18, Luke 16:17]. And He perfectly obeyed the law throughout His life on earth, all the way to Calvary.

I decided this means that through Christ's death the power of the law is broken.
2 Corinthians 3:3-8 wrote:Forasmuch as ye are manifestly declared to be the epistle of Christ ministered by us, written not with ink, but with the Spirit of the living God; not in tables of stone, but in fleshy tables of the heart. And such trust have we through Christ to God-ward: Not that we are sufficient of ourselves to think any thing as of ourselves; but our sufficiency is of God; Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life. But if the ministration of death, written and engraven in stones, was glorious, so that the children of Israel could not stedfastly behold the face of Moses for the glory of his countenance; which glory was to be done away: How shall not the ministration of the spirit be rather glorious?
Of course, there's also Matthew 27:51. When Jesus died, "the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom"!

I think this quote from Corinthians might have been some of what I was thinking about using to back up my point. The Deep Magic could be the law itself because the law is still the law whether it is written down or not. The Stone Table is merely one of the places the law is written (there are at least two others). The law itself is not broken, but the people’s dependence on the law is. The Deep Magic still exists, but its visible sign in no longer needed. (The breaking of the Stone Table could also remind us of Moses’ breaking of the stone tablets. Moses broke the tablets but he did not break the law. God gave him new tablets and could continue to do so forever without the law changing).
In summary, I think:
The Deep Magic is the law
The Stone Table is similar to the stone tablets given to Moses. If I remember right, the tablets were used to show the [old] covenant between God and his people.
Exodus 34:10-11 AMP 10And the Lord said, Behold, I lay down [afresh the terms of the mutual agreement between Israel and Me] a covenant. Before all your people I will do marvels (wonders, miracles) such as have not been wrought or created in all the earth or in any nation; and all the people among whom you are shall see the work of the Lord; for it is a terrible thing [fearful and full of awe] that I will do with you. 11Observe what I command you this day. Behold, I drive out before you the Amorite, Canaanite, Hittite, Perizzite, Hivite, and Jebusite.
When Jesus died, the old covenant was no longer needed / binding. Likewise, when Aslan died, the stone table was no longer need.
The Deeper Magic is like the new covenant and also the means by which the Deep Magic is fulfilled to its completeness.
narnian1 wrote:I do think the event needs to be looked on as Christ on the cross, even though in Narnia Aslan only dies for Edmund versus Jesus dying for all men (these are supposals, not allegories, so not everything will translate perfectly).
I always thought that although Aslan did die for Edmund he also died for all of Narnia. Narnia’s fate was closely tied to Edmund’s. They needed the four children for the four thrones, but they couldn’t deny the White Witch either or all of Narnia would be destroyed. Since the stone table cracked they wouldn’t be required to die for their treacheries. I can see where you are coming from however.
I have been working on this post for hours so I’m a little tired and perhaps a little muddled.

I tried to proofread it for clarity but I’m not sure if it is clear. Please ask questions if it is unclear.