Um, yeah. Let's just say a stubborn 12-year-old's decision not to read Lord of the Rings kept me from getting to the book near as soon as I should have. I really regret that, and wish I had been able to delve into the book with no preconceived images from the movies (I hadn't seen them, but I had seen pictures and some video clips); plus the spoilers I happened across in life. I do rate the book highly. The masterful writing and story weaving left me in wonder at how stupid I was not to have read it earlier. Does that answer your question?Kate wrote:This was your first read of LotR? I'm surprised! I would have thought you would have already read it. Why do you wish you'd read it earlier?
Dppselej, glad that KoA earned a higher place in your rankings. How did you feel about Attolia? Gen? Costis? Did you get frustrated with Gen at all? Why didn't you like TT and QoA? Is it the characters? The writing? The plot? I need a little more of your thoughts before the conversion can fully occur.
Woah, did you read 800 pages over the weekend? Or had you started it before?Maddy wrote:Due to my weekend trip, I had great time for reading in the car. I'm now roughly 800 pages into Les Miserables and I love every bit of it.
Middlemarch is a large book, but other then a slow-ish beginning, it's not too boggy. It's a wonderful read and I highly recommend it.220chrisTian wrote:I have yet to read DD or Middlemarch, although I'd love to when I get the chance.
GtG, I'm enjoying S&S. It's not the best Austen, but it's still Austen. I look forward to your thoughts when you're through with it. Oh, and The Hobbit before LotR.
narnian1, although I was somewhat in agreement with the scene you mentioned in your spoiler being cut from the movies; I disagree that it was wrong in the books. The point it serves is to show just how dire the situation was. The Shire was never given cause to worry about anything much more then who would get the last mushroom. Yet, they soon had evil within their borders and were not the simple hobbits without a care in the world as they once were. Also, it gave Pippin and Merry a chance to show off their new found amazingness.
I've not read Billy Budd, but I do somewhat agree with your statement of high school assigned readings being analyzed to the point of mutilation; missing the point of the novel. I was home schooled and I still had these problems! I personally was excited about The Scarlet Letter (plus Mom loosened her strictness on the curriculum's set up) and greatly enjoyed it. A year and a half before I had been indifferent to Silas Marner and hated strongly disliked it by the time I was through with it. The biggest difference was that I was given lenience on all the minor things needed to be known vs. having had to know everyone who hung out at the pub in SM and their occupations. Not something that made me develop an undying love for the book. [/rambling and ranting]Shadow wrote:But I guess high school sort of ruined some things for me and Silas Marner might have fallen into that category where it sits glumly next to The Scarlet Letter and Billy Budd. Nuff' said.
Lady Courage, welcome to NWeb! The Count of Monte Cristo is a hefty book, but it's written in a pretty serialistic (today, that's a word) manner, and is only slow for the first quarter, if even that long. It's a great read. Make sure you do have an unabridged version though. There's some imposters out there that hide the fact they are abridged.